1,940 results for 'court:"Texas Courts of Appeals"'.
J. Bailey finds that the lower court properly denied the appellant's motion to recuse the judge based on an allegation of partiality in this eviction proceeding. The judge dismissed the appellant's counterclaim petition "the day after it was filed." It may have been improper to rule on the dismissal motion "without notice or hearing," but the ruling was "not a result of prejudice." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Bailey, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 11-22-00127-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Real Estate
J. Tijerina finds that the lower court properly ruled in favor of the city in this breach of contract case arising from an agreement to perform certain road improvements. On appeal, the construction companies contend that the evidence is insufficient to establish their breach of the contract. But the evidence showed a "failure to adhere to the progress schedule." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Tijerina, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 13-22-00416-CV, Categories: Evidence, Damages, Contract
J. Silva finds that the lower court properly terminated the parental rights of the mother to her two children. Contrary to the mother's arguments on appeal, the evidence sufficiently supports the statutory grounds for termination and the lower court's best interest finding. There was evidence of drug use by the mother while she was pregnant. There was also evidence that she failed to complete her service plan and testimony that the children's current foster placement is with a "loving home." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Silva, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 13-23-00591-CV, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
Per curiam, the Ninth District denies the inmate's petition for a writ of mandamus. The inmate seeks to compel the trial court to provide file-stamped copies of documents involving tax sale proceeds for which he is an heir. He fails to explain why not having file-stamped documents, or a response from the clerk acknowledging their filing, prevents him from proceeding to a disposition of his motion for release of the proceeds.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 09-23-00335-CV, Categories: Tax, Wills / Probate, Prisoners' Rights
J. Garcia finds that the lower court properly entered an order in this suit to modify the parent-child relationship. The order required the mother to pay child support to the father, and the mother now argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish "a material and substantial change of circumstances." However, the record does not contain certain interviews, and there is a presumption that "the missing evidence supports the trial judge's finding." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Garcia, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00392-CV, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Bailey finds that the lower court properly ruled in this dispute over a beneficiary designation under a life insurance policy. The decedent changed the beneficiary "approximately two weeks before his death." The change was effective "based on the terms of the policy, without reference to any agreements or court-ordered obligations." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Bailey, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 11-22-00130-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Insurance
J. Byrne finds that the trial court properly ruled against a father in a divorce case. The father challenges the court's decision to give the mother the right to choose the children's place of residence, alleging that past instances where the children were injured in the mother's care placed them at risk. The mother's testimony and evidentiary record refute the father's claims. Having failed to show that being placed with their mother would not be in the children's best interest, the trial court correctly ruled against the father. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00290-CV, Categories: Family Law
J. Byrne finds that the trial court properly ruled against a truck driver who collided with a vehicle that was disabled on the shoulder of the highway. The truck driver sued the other driver and his employer, alleging negligence due to his failure to place reflective cones behind his disabled vehicle. Despite the truck driver's arguments to the contrary, the exclusion of the on-scene trooper's testimony did not lead to an improper judgment. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00266-CV, Categories: Tort, Vehicle
J. Kelly finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant, the owner of a group home, of indecency with a child. Defendant argues that it was not her who took advantage of the 5-year-old victim, but she who was the victim. Reviewing the evidence, the trial court used its common sense to conclude that it was defendant, an adult woman, who caused the child to touch her sexual organs. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Kelly, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00697-CR, Categories: Sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Baker finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant of capital murder. Defendant argues that errors in the abstract of the jury charge led to him being harmed, specifically the mention of "intentionality" in the course of determining whether someone has committed capital murder. While the abstract did contain errors, the rest of the abstract greatly outweighs any potential harm those errors could have had on defendant's case. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Baker, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00044-CR, Categories: Jury, Murder, Robbery
J. Smith finds that the trial court properly and improperly ruled in a breach of fiduciary duty case filed by the co-owner of a corporation against an attorney who represented the corporation in litigation. The co-owners alleged in their complaint that the attorney failed to inform the corporation's board of directors of a possible conflict of interest and aided another owner of the corporation in starting a competing firm. Nothing in the evidence establishes a relationship between the co-owner and the attorney. However, remaining questions on the award of attorney fees in this litigation still exist and should be adjudicated. Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00234-CV, Categories: Corporations, Fiduciary Duty, Attorney Fees
J. Baker finds that the trial court improperly ruled against an interior design firm that a design communications company sued for breach of a promissory note. The design firm argues that genuine fact issues remain on their counterclaims, specifically, an affidavit purporting to challenge the notion that there was a joint venture between the entities, entitling the communications company to a promissory note from the design firm. The trial court did indeed err in excluding the affidavit. Furthermore, the company is not entitled to summary judgment on the firm's breach of fiduciary duty claims while these fact issues exist. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Baker, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00451-CV, Categories: Corporations, Evidence, Fiduciary Duty
J. Kelly finds that the trial court improperly ruled against the owner of an oil and gas company in a leasing case brought by a holdings firm. The trial court found that the lease had been terminated due to lack of production. The trial court's decision was in error because fact issues remain on whether production had totally ceased on the tract of land. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Kelly, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00478-CV, Categories: Property
J. Baker finds that the county court properly ruled against a homeowner in a debt case filed by a repairman who was not paid after working on the homeowner's septic system. The homeowner refused to pay for the services, alleging that the repairman did not complete the work and caused more damage to her septic system. The repairman's testimony that he completed the repairs is more credible than the homeowner's counter assertions. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Baker, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00492-CV, Categories: Tort, Contract
J. Theofanis finds that the trial court properly ruled against car owners who sued a collision repair shop that allegedly forced them to pay fees to recover their car. Because the car owners filed their claims two years and five days from the date of the incident, their claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Theofanis, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00265-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Conversion
J. Partida-Kipness finds that the lower court properly granted the appellees' pleas to the jurisdiction in this suit involving the appellant's property taxes and allegations that his payments were not properly applied against a judgment. The pro se appellant fails to adequately brief his issues, and the court additionally finds that the appellees were "entitled to dismissal" based on governmental immunity. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Partida-Kipness, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00224-CV, Categories: Tax, Fiduciary Duty, Jurisdiction
J. Carlyle finds that the lower court properly granted summary judgment to the appellee in this dispute involving the validity of the parties' partition agreement. The appellant failed to address "each ground upon which the judgment could have been based." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Carlyle, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00844-CV, Categories: Family Law, Contract
J. Zimmerer finds that the trial court properly denied the city's plea to the jurisdiction in a flight attendant's suit after a slip and fall at Bush Intercontinental Airport. There is a fact issue on the challenged elements of the claim, including the city's knowledge of the alleged dangerous condition. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Zimmerer, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00319-CV, Categories: Tort, Immunity, Jurisdiction
J. Parker denies the appellants' motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration, withdraws the court's prior opinion, and substitutes the current memorandum opinion, holding that the lower court properly denied their dismissal motion pursuant the Texas Citizens Participation Act. The court concludes that the claims at issue in this case, involving allegations of fraudulent transfer, are not based on the exercise of the right to petition. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 07-23-00271-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Fraud
J. Poissant finds that the trial court improperly dismissed for want of prosecution the subcontractor's suit over unpaid services. The subcontractor gave a reasonable explanation of his counsel's failure to appear at the status conference, so the motion to reinstate should have been granted. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Poissant, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00059-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Contract
J. Jewell finds that the trial court properly ruled in favor of the seller of a property in a bill-of-review action involving a dispute over a private transfer fee. The trustee's argument that it was not served in the "proper capacity" in the prior suit lacks merit. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Jewell, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00092-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Property
J. Palafox denies habeas relief to defendant, who argued that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was arrested and charged for murder as an adult despite being only 17 at the time of the offense. Pretrial habeas relief is not available unless the asserted rights would be "undermined if not vindicated before trial," which is not the case here. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: April 22, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00154-CR, Categories: Constitution, Juvenile Law, Civil Rights
J. Palafox denies habeas relief to defendant, who argued that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was arrested and charged for murder as an adult despite being only 17 at the time. Pretrial habeas relief is not available unless the asserted rights would be “undermined if not vindicated before trial,” which is not the case here. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: April 22, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00159-CR, Categories: Constitution, Juvenile Law, Civil Rights
J. Landau finds the lower court improperly issued a default family violence protective order against a boyfriend. A girlfriend applied for the protective order on grounds of alleged harassment and family violence. A temporary order was granted and a date for the protective order hearing was set, but the boyfriend did not appear. A private process server’s affidavit stated that the boyfriend had been served the citation and application for protective order, and the lower court issued a default judgment against the boyfriend and issued a lifetime protective order. The instant court finds that the default protective order required service of notice of the application, and the record does not show that he was served with it. The matter is remanded for further proceedings. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Landau, Filed On: April 21, 2024, Case #: 01-22-00597-CV, Categories: Restraining Order
J. Kelly finds that the trial court properly ruled in a trust termination suit filed by an attorney, who previously represented a minor in a personal injury case that established an annuity to be paid to the minor through a trust. The trial court signed an agreed order discharging the trust, ordering it to make payments to the minor and the attorney. However, after the trust sought to vacate the order on the grounds it interfered with its contractual rights to the owner of the annuity, the trial court rescinded its previous order. On appeal, the attorney seeks to challenge the trial court's decision. Because the court's order vacating the agreement is not a final appealable judgment, the attorney lacks the authority to bring his challenge.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Kelly, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00791-CV, Categories: Settlements, Trusts